Wednesday, 9 May 2012

Bionic Suit Help paralyzed



Claire Lomas completed the London Marathon on Tuesday despite being paralyzed from the waist down.
Lomas, 32, wore a bionic suit to make the 26.2-mile journey. It took her 17 days to finish, which disqualifies her from receiving a medal. But many who did finish the race in time decided to donate their own medals to Lomas, in honor of her incredible efforts.



Lomas had arranged for donors to sponsor her progress, and she managed to raise over $138,000 for an organization called Spinal Research, which supports medical studies in order to fight paralysis.
Virgin, the company that sponsors the race, awarded Lomas with its annual trophy for endurance.
Holly Branson, daughter of Virgin owner Richard Branson, handed that trophy the triumphant finisher. "She has done the most amazing job," said Holly. "It was so emotional when she crossed that line. Tears welled up in my eyes and everyone was cheering."     


Lomas hasn't been able to stand since a horse-riding accident in 2007 left her paralyzed from the chest down. Her horse, Rolled Oats, tossed her off his back during the Osberton nhorse trials in Nottinghamshire, reports The Guardian. The fall punctured her lung and broke her ribs, back and neck.

"After my accident, for a few days, you think, why, why has this happened? But it has. And that's that. You just need to find new things to do," she said. unsecured loans

But this year, a $75,000 bionic suit called ReWalk enabled her to walk again. The suit was designed by an Israeli entrepreneur and is marketed by Argo Medical Technologies.

"It's amazing, after five years of sitting down, to be back on my feet," she said to ABC earlier this year.
At first, she could only take about 30 steps a day. But in order to complete the London Marathon, she walked an approximate average of 3,200 steps each day, for 17 days straight. It was grueling work, but Lomas was determined.

That's why the late finish was an incredible achievement. "It's a moment I'm going to treasure for the rest of my life," she said in an interview after the race. "I couldn't believe it when I turned up this morning in the taxi to start, and I thought it was just a busy day in London. Someone told me they're all there for me. I was like, no!"
It wasn't just the fans that inspired Claire Lomas to go on; she was also supported by her husband Dan and young daughter, Maisie. Both greeted her at the finish line.  bad credit loans

dead space 3 confirmed


the big Dead Space 3 leak, citing a ‘source’ and detailing a good chunk of the game that EA have still yet to really talk about outside of investor calls. Whilst we’re expecting a good look at Dead Space 3 at EA next month, this serves as a handy taster.

Warning, whilst we can’t verify any of this information, we suggest there are massive spoilers below.
The site talks about “drop-in, drop out co-op”, with Isaac’s partner someone with a ”gnarly scar on his face, an engineering RIG of his own, and glowing red eyes peering from his helmet”. They also confirm previous rumours that the game will be set in a snowy, desolate location.

“At one point in Dead Space 3,” says the leak, “Isaac and his counterpart stumble, wounded, bloody, and missing chunks of armor, out of burnt wreckage together. In single-player, the same scene happens without the other character.”

“Players will also work together (using telekinesis, for instance) to interact with pieces of the environment. In addition, you’ll be able to share ammo with and heal your co-op partner, although there is no revive system – once someone’s down and dead, both players reload the last checkpoint.” unsecured loans

There are changes to the weaponry, too.  ”The Plasma Cutter, whose default horizontal shot changed to vertical, is an entirely different weapon now,” says the detailed, but somewhat speculative report. “Its alt-fire mode now has a similar knockback effect to the Force Gun. The Pulse Rifle features the saw-blades as a secondary firing mode.”

Isaac himself is more nimble, too, and it looks like there’s a cover system on the way.
“Crouching is one of Isaac’s most notable new abilities, bad credit loans and it functions as his means of cover as he hides behind small objects. The left/right evasive roll is unquestionably the most significant change we know of in his new skill set.”

And enemies? Human beings, alongside the usual Necromorphs. “Heavily armored soldiers pack guns and grenades to use against you,”

“Of course, these guys become Necromorphs as well.”

Tuesday, 8 May 2012

Cinemagram


We love to focus on freebies, but at the same time occasionally an app will come along with a modest price tag that’s just so good we have to sing from the rooftops and offer an honest opinion.

It’s even rarer when two come along at once but if you were watching closely yesterday I reviewed Clear, a new paid list-making app that takes the mundane task of remembering things and makes it simple and fun. Today we’re taking a look at Cinemagram, an insanely easy way to create cinemagraphs on your iPhone in minutes.

Hipster lens-less glasses at the ready!

Cinemagraphs? Eh?

A cinemagraph is essentially the marriage of still photos and moving video, except only a portion of the scene is animated. Typical examples include a tree swaying in the breeze, water flowing from a tap or the flame on a candle. In case you’re still confused, here’s a cinemagraph that I have made using the very app I’m about to talk about.



James has previously walked you through the process of creating these hybrids UNSEcured loans using Photoshop CS5, a software suite that would leave many of us bankrupt for a month. The process isn’t too complicated, but takes time, effort and patience in order to achieve the desired result. While the finished product might be a tad unsecured loans more professional than what Cinemagram offers, there’s certainly no easier way of taking the world around you and turning it into an animated still.                            

galaxy s3


GALAXY-SIII-4
And here it is. The Samsung Galaxy S3 has just been made official at the South Korean company’s official launch event in London by JK Shin, President of Samsung’s mobile communication division. It’s been the subject of rumours ever since the iPhone 4S went on sale, we can now finally put them to bed. The new flagship Android phone is here and we’ve got the details – including an all new voice command service. Read on for all the news.


If you’ve been following the rumour mill online, the Samsung Galaxy S3 may not come as too much of a surprise: it is indeed the curvaceous phone with a physical home button we’ve seen nestling in a variety of different cases over the last fortnight.

But it should still get you salivating. Samsung has confirmed that the Samsung Galaxy S3 packs a giant 4.8-inch HD Super-AMOLED display. That’s as well as an 8-megapixel camera (with features like burst shot) and the Exynos 4412 quad-core processor that appears to have spanked all-comers in leaked benchmark results recently.

But of course, hardware’s only ever part of the story. The Samsung Galaxy S3 runs Android 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich) out of the box, but it’s no watered down version like the TouchWiz-infused update belatedly pushed out on its predecessor, the Galaxy S2.

Instead, you get a new, much-improved version with easy, intuitive multitasking and a ream of tweaked Android 4.0 features, as well as an improved homescreen that lets you plonk Google’s array of new Android 4.0 widgets on it happily. S-Beam, for example, is Sammie’s bespoke version of Android Beam.
Samsung’s also added a few new features on top of Ice Cream Sandwich, including S Voice, a new voice assistant that looks remarkably like Siri on the iPhone 4S. Samsung says S Voice “provides powerful device control and commands. When your phone alarm goes off but you need a little extra rest, just tell the Galaxy S3 “snooze” – and it snoozes.” That’s on top of being able to play songs and the like. unsecured loans

What’s impressive is that it’s always listening. Instead of pressing a button, you simply say “Hi Galaxy,” and it’ll wake up. It also lets you open the camera, which Siri currently doesn’t let you do. (Of course, Google’s own Voice Actions can still be run, though having two different virtual butlers might prove rather confusing).

On top of that, the 1.9-Megapixel front-facing camera recognises your eye movements, leaving the screen on for as long as you’re looking at it. It’s a feature called ‘Smart Stay’, and it’s genius. That ties in with the proximity sensor too; texting? Bring the phone up to your ear and it’ll automatically call who you’re talking to.
It’s just 8.6mm thick, and is “inspired by nature” – leaves and pebbles, to be specific. It’s made from a new ‘Hyperglaze’ process, making it seamless, and is available in ‘Pebble Blue’ and Marble White’. The Samsung Galaxy S3 has been designed to be an intuitive, natural experience. “It sees what you see, it listens to what you say, it shares what you love. It is designed for humans,” said the opening video at tonight’s event. It seems that, for all the hyperbole, that Samsung’s managed that.




Carphone Warehouse and several UK networks including Vodafone and O2 have already announced that they will be stocking the Samsung Galaxy S3; Samsung says that the 3G version will be released end of May in Europe (May 29th), and an LTE 4G model will drop the June in the US. We’re live at the event right now so stay tuned for our hands on shortly. bad credit loans Although we haven’t heard anything about pricing yet, we’d expect tariffs to start popping up sharpish.

Friday, 4 May 2012

Macs Can get viruses

Apple’s Get-a-Mac ads (and many longtime Mac users and fans) love to imply that Mac OS X is a far safer and more secure platform than Windows. And there is a ring of truth to that implication. There are far more instances of malware and viruses bogging down Windows PCs than afflict Macs.
But that doesn’t mean Macs are perfectly safe and secure computers -- after all, no computer is completely safe and secure on the Internet.
New malware threats (including the discovery of the first botnet operating on infected Mac OS X machines) are cropping up this year. It’s likely just a sign of things to come as Apple gains market share and visibility.
So Mac users need to understand their options for protecting their systems from malware, network attacks, and other threats.
In this guide, I’ll break down three potential areas of danger –
1) viruses and malware, 2) network attacks, and 3) spam – and details some of best the tools to combat them.

Anti-virus tools

Let’s start with the classic specter of computer security – the virus or malware. The word virus is almost a misnomer these days. There are still some classic versions of viruses that spread from disk to disk, wreaking havoc and deleting files – many from a kid who created a virus because he could.
In truth, however, the bigger threats today are from forms of malware that compromise open network connections to servers over the Internet. These servers can then record personal information (user passwords, keystrokes) and take over a machine in the background.
Often these attacks fall into the categories of Trojan horses that masquerade as some innocuous application or video codec that gets installed by the average user. The most recent Mac threats started in this form as components included in real software packages pirated over the Internet.
Being vigilant about what your install and where it comes from is one way to combat this threat. But for the average Mac user who installs a file to view content on a website, the threat still exists.
Another major virus threat is that of macro viruses--most often associated with Microsoft Office. While Macs are typically not as likely to experience severe damage if they open an infected Office document, they are still capable of experiencing some problems--and of passing the virus on to others.
So every Mac should have some form of anti-virus software. Here are the major options:
ClamXav – ClamXav is a simple open source anti-virus tool that is available for free. It is based on the open source Unix clamav, but sports a Mac-like graphical interface.
ClamXav works pretty well, though its interface is a little clunky and it is generally slow at performing scans. Its big downside is that it offers less automation options than other tools, meaning users must be more pro-active about updating virus definitions (the files anti-virus tools use to detect malware) as well as performing scans. It also doesn’t allow you to scan your entire startup drive, meaning you’ll manually need to select folders to scan. unsecured loans
McAfee VirusScan – McAfee has a long history of developing anti-virus tools and this was at one time bundled with Apple’s .Mac service (the precursor of Mobile Me). McAfee is a decent if not stellar product. It tends to be slower than some of its competition and does show itself to be a product produced from a largely PC-oriented company.
Norton AntiVirus – Like McAfee, Norton develops security and utility tools for both the Windows and the Mac. A while back, Norton’s Mac offerings in both anti-virus and disk utilities were among the best products on the market.
But times change. Norton still produces a compelling product and I’d probably pick it over VirusScan. However, it too suffers from being very obviously a Mac product designed by a predominantly PC-focused company. For businesses that are already invested in other Norton products for managing their PCs, however, it can be an easy addition to an already complete suite (most likely with volume licensing discounts).
Sophos Anti-Virus SBE – Sophos also suffers a bit from being a PC-oriented company, but less than McAfee or Norton do. They produce a simple and lightweight solution for Mac OS X that can be centrally managed very easily.
The downside to Sophos, in my opinion, is less their PC-centric nature than their business-oriented nature and licensing. If you’re a business that has multiple Macs and PCs to protect, Sophos is a great choice (particularly if you’ve got a Windows server – even one in virtualization) to use for central management of both scanning and updating. In fact, for small businesses and/or cross platform businesses that need a simple and effective centralized management option, Sophos is a very good choice.
Intego VirusBarrier – Hands down, the best choice for consumers and for fully Mac-based businesses has to be Intego’s VirusBarrier. The company is entirely Mac focused, provides a solution that is simple, lightweight, and has a very Mac-like feel to it that make it a natural choice for many Mac users.
It also offers centralized management (and integration with Intego’s other security tools) for businesses and schools – though if you have a mix of both Macs and PCs to centrally manage, you might want to opt for Norton or Sophos because of their cross-platform management capabilities (and potentially better pricing due to larger volume purchases).
MacScan – MacScan is an anti-spyware rather than an anti-virus tool. The software is designed for detecting spyware processes and applications (keylogging, remote access, and DNS poisoning tools) that may not fall into the typical categories of viruses.
It also focuses on Internet cookies and similar data gathering tools that are not directly classified as malware. The software compares cookies (small bits of data stored by web browsers to keep track of user data when moving from one web page to another) against a blacklist of known malicious web services.
MacScan is a great complement to other anti-virus and security tools and is especially helpful for Macs commonly used by large numbers of individuals (who might place keyloggers and other malicious tools directly on a Mac rather than remotely).
One final tip, regardless of your anti-virus choice: if you’re running Windows on a Mac (either using boot camp or virtualization tools like Parallels, VMWare Fusion, or Virtual Box) don’t forget that you’ll need anti-virus software on that front too. Norton and Intego both offer Mac/PC protection suites to fill this need in a single product (though in Intego’s case the Windows software is provided by partnering with BitDefender AntiVirus for Windows).

Firewalls

Firewalls come in all shapes and sizes. Some are physical devices that sit between a computer or network and the Internet while others are software installed on individual machines. Regardless of their form, firewalls are designed to protect your computer from unauthorized access via its network/Internet connection.
While hardware firewalls are great for protecting all the computing devices in your home or office, they don’t offer protection for mobile computers that use a variety of public and private wireless networks. For this, software firewalls installed on those computers are needed – particularly on public networks where any computer connected to the same Wi-Fi hotspot can easily see and potentially access any other.
Mac OS X’s Built-in Firewall – Mac OS X has shipped with a built-in firewall based on the Unix ipfw firewall for several years. Leopard introduced an adaptive firewall interface that is extremely easy for users to configure and work with. It doesn’t offer the option to directly configure complex rules (just the ability to allow or deny incoming connections – though you can modify the list of allowed or blocked applications making those connections fairly easily). Advanced users familiar with Unix will also find that ipfw’s full suite of options available from the command line.
While Apple did a good job in crafting a very easy-to-use firewall and one that is generally decent, itss limitations do show, particularly if you need to a firewall for any professional situation. At the very least, however, every Mac user should be using it.
Intego’s NetBarrier – Intego again gets my props for its NetBarrier firewall. NetBarrier is designed to be easy to use (like Leopard’s built-in firewall), but is also designed to offer easy configuration of more complex rules from a Mac-like GUI. It also offers a number of pre-configured settings that can applicable to both home and education/business environments, including rules to block specific types of applications (such as peer-to-peer file sharing sites) and specific types of known threats (such as those posed by spyware).
In addition to being highly configurable and yet very easy to use, NetBarrier is a powerful tool for protecting a Mac. It offers a number of extra features beyond basic filtering of incoming and outgoing connections, including the ability to define specific sets of rules for different locations (home, office, public Wi-Fi, etc), and it shows you how much bandwidth is being used for various types of network access (web, email, iTunes file sharing, etc),
Norton Internet Security Suite – Norton Internet Security is Symantec’s firewall product for both the Mac and Windows. The suite offers a solid solution and integrates with Symantec’s Deepsight blacklist, a global list of Internet addresses associated with various forms of network attack and malware distribution. Like NetBarrier, it also allows you to define different settings based on location.
Like NetBarrier, Norton Internet Security strives to offer powerful firewall rules and protection options in a simple manner that all users can comprehend and manage. The interface isn’t quite as intuitive in my opinion, and it lacks some of the extra features that Intego built into NetBarrier. That said, it is still a powerful solution and offers a few features of its own, including a file guard technology for securing access to files on your hard drive.
DoorStop X– From Open Door Networks. DoorStop X is a firewall that offers a more stripped down interface than either NetBarrier or Norton Internet Security. Instead of being focused on consumer-friendly interface elements and extra features, DoorStop X focuses on simply being a good firewall. It allows a decent set of rules and enables you to easily configure protection for common Mac services (such as web access and file sharing).
The downside is that DoorStop X is not as easy as NetBarrier or Norton to configure for novice computer users. For consumers looking for a very simple solution, this probably makes it a less desirable choice. For power users and technicians wanting something that allows easy configuration of the core features of a firewall without a lot of bells and whistles, this can actually make DoorStopX somewhat more appealing.
IPNetSentryX – IPNetSentryX is a fourth firewall option for Mac OS X. It is a robust tool that operates slightly different from a traditional firewall. Typically, firewalls rely on a fixed set of rules to allow or deny connections (the default rule being to deny everything). IPNetSentryX does offer this, but it’s designed to run in an adaptive fashion, monitoring your network/Internet traffic but not blocking connections unless there is some suspicious activity (either defined by its default settings or by your custom rules).
Although its approach makes for a lightweight and adaptive product (and one which can be used for anything from simple protection to complex bandwidth management), IPNetSentryX’s interface is probably the least user friendly of the firewalls available for Mac OS X. This can be off-putting to many users. However, if you’re a power user or technician and want to leverage a number of complex firewall options, it’s worth checking out.
Who’s There? – A companion product to DoorStop X, Who’s There? isn't a firewall itself, but rather an application that reads firewall logs and provides information and advice about the entries it finds. This can help you fine-tune your firewall settings and better understand how your firewall is protecting (or not protecting) your Mac.
Little Snitch – Like Who’s There?, Little Snitch isn’t a firewall but a useful companion to one. But while Who’s There? and your firewall logs can often inform you easily about incoming connections to your Mac, Little Snitch is focused on the opposite – telling you what applications and services (such as file sharing or iTunes Music Sharing) your Mac is attempting to connect with on network resources or the Internet.
Since some malicious tools (or even legitimate software) installed on your Mac are typically allowed to make outgoing connections through a firewall, being aware of exactly what the software on your Mac is trying to do and who it’s trying to contact can be a great security aid.
Armed with the information that Little Snitch provides, you can craft better firewall rules if needed. You can also use it to turn off unused services (such as file sharing, screen sharing, or even iTunes) that could make your Mac more vulnerable to attack. It even provides a way of simply being aware how people using your Mac are accessing the Internet. All of these make Little Snitch a great Mac security aid.

Anti-spam tools

Most people tend to think of spam as an annoyance that clogs up their inbox and keeps them from getting to really important emails – and that’s certainly true. But spam isn’t just a productivity killer, it can pose a real security threat. Junk emails often load web content that has the potential to impact your computer whether or not you click on a web site referenced in the message.
And often clicking a link in a message will deliver you to some form of malicious website designed to either install malware or use a phishing scheme intended to mine personal information.
The fight against spam can and should take place on multiple levels. Ideally, your mail server will have its own junk mail filtering. Public services like Apple’s Mobile Me, GMail, YahooMail, and Hotmail offer some of the best spam filtering because they handle mail accounts for so many people. But private servers (those run by an Internet provider or private company) may not have such extensive or fine-tuned spam filtering.
Beyond the server level, filtering can take place on your computer. Almost all email applications, including Apple’s Mail and Microsoft’s Entourage (the two most common Mac email clients) include some junk mail filtering options. But you can extend those capabilities with additional anti-spam software, including the following:
SpamSweep – SpamSweep is an application that acts as a middleman between your email client. SpamSweep connects to your mail server, downloads the first 100K of each message, scans them, and then deletes the spam while it’s still on the server (you can control confirmation of what is and isn’t spam). When your mail application connects, it downloads the remaining (good) messages.
SpamSweep uses a combination of blacklist (bad) and whitelist (good) email senders as well as a technique called Bayesian filtering, which analyzes the content of each message to determine how to mark messages. These filters and lists can be trained by marking mail as spam (or not spam) and grows more accurate over time as you use the software.
Overall, SpamSweep is pretty good at making good choices and you can define some overrides to its basic features. On the downside, it does need to sit as a separate program rather than being integrated into your email client and it’s a little disconcerting to have a separate program deleting messages for you. Also, it doesn’t provide any real customized rulemaking options other than training its filters over time.
SpamSieve - SpamSieve may be the best of the anti-spam additions for Mac OS X. While it uses the same filtering techniques as SpamSweep, it does so by integrating with your email client and Mac OS X’s Address Book. It supports a wide range of clients, including the most common Mail, Entourage, Eudora and Thunderbird. bad credit loans
So you don’t need to launch a separate application to confirm the software’s spam/not spam decisions. It also means your email is still managed by your email application. The support for Address Book (and contacts in Entourage) is a nice way of ensuring anyone you actually know will be able to reach you.
SpamSieve does offer its own separate application as well. This is used to configure filters (and quite a bit of configuration is supported) and training process. It also allows you to configure mail notifications and other points of integration with your email client. Perhaps most importantly, SpamSieve does an impressive job of accurately filtering spam.
Intego Antispam - Intego’s offering in antispam category, appropriately named Personal Antispam, is another good choice. It integrates with either Mail or Entourage and can integrate with Address Book for trusting contacts. Although this is a more limited set of email clients than other tools, it does cover most Mac users.
As with their other tools, Intego has put an effort into making Antispam very user friendly. Beyond just being user-friendly, it offers the ability to customize filtering and offers filtering options beyond just blacklist/whitelist and Bayesian filtering options in other tools. You can also filter based on types of attachments or portions of web site addresses noted in an email. This provides additional capabilities. A particularly nice feature is that not only can you configure each type of filter, you can also opt to use all or only some of them.
Personal Antispam enables you to export spam rules as files for installation directly on other Macs running the software. It also offers usage reports and graphs, helping you see the percentage of spam being filtered as well as the types. Overall, this is another great product from Intego.

Mac security software: more information

While keeping your Mac secure is about finding the right mix of tools for your needs (and your level of comfort with technology), equally important is keeping those tools updated and understanding how to use them effectively. Whichever tools you choose, be sure to read and understand the documentation.

Thursday, 3 May 2012

Homeland and Breaking Bad



"Homeland" continued marking its impressive first season by landing more awards. After winning Best Television Series - Drama at Golden Globe Awards which was held this January, the Claire Danes-starring show won the writing prize for New Series at the 2012 WGA Awards. The Showtime thriller additionally nabbed the Episodic Drama kudo, sharing the title with AMC's acclaimed show "Breaking Bad".

"Breaking Bad" had its second win at the Sunday, February 19 ceremony after beating out "Homeland", "Boardwalk Empire", "Game of Thrones" and "The Good Wife" in Drama Series category. Accepting the award, creator Vince Gilligan praised lead actor Bryan Cranston as saying, "We wouldn't have a show without Bryan Cranston."

"Modern Family", meanwhile, was the big winner in comedy categories. Edging out the likes of "30 Rock" and "Parks and Recreation" for Comedy Series kudo, the show nabbed another prize for its episode "Caught in the Act".  unsecured loans

Commenting on their victorious night, co-creator Steve Levitan enthused, "We are concerned that people are sick of us [winning]. Perhaps you can focus your backlash elsewhere. As such, we asked our writers to each say why they don't feel like winners tonight."

The show's writers then dished on their deepest regrets, with some of them including, "I have 2 years left in this business, especially after they find out my real age," and "I created the show STAT and have to live with that."

"The Simpsons", which recently hit the milestone with the airing of its 500th episode, scored an award for Animation category. "Cinema Verite" and "Too Big to Fail" also won one prize each, for Long Form - Original and Long Form - Adapted category respectively. "The Colbert Report" won the Comedy / Variety prize, while "General Hospital" beat other daytime dramas.

The winners of WGA Awards were announced in simultaneous ceremonies held in Los Angeles and New York City. Zooey Deschanel served as the host at the show, which also presented gongs for the best writings in movies.  bad credit loans

Receiving the special honors were Patric M. Verrone (The Honorary Service - Morgan Cox Award), Marshall Herskovitz and Edward Zwick (the Paddy Chayefsky Laurel Award for Television), Eric Roth (the Laurel Award for Screen), as well as Tate Taylor (the Special Achievement - Paul Selvin Award).

Xbox 360 bundle on rent


Report: Microsoft to offer $99 Xbox 360 bundle with online service commitment
Buying a home video game console may soon become a lot more like buying a cell phone, according to a new report suggesting Microsoft is planning to offer a subsidized, $99 bundle including a 4GB Xbox 360 and Kinect sensor to anyone who commits to two years of a new, $15 monthly online service package.
According to a report from The Verge, which cites unnamed sources, the new subsidized bundle will be available "as early as next week" in Microsoft's bad credit loans retail stores. The $15 monthly subscription would reportedly include all the online gameplay features of a current Xbox Live Gold subscription, alongside unspecified additional content from cable or live sports video providers.

Such a new content plan could help position the Xbox unsecured loans much more directly as a full-service living room entertainment center, rather than primarily as a video game system. That's a transition Microsoft has been signalling for years with its slow accumulation of online entertainment apps, and one that seems somewhat natural given that entertainment apps are already more popular than online gaming on the Xbox 360. The report also fits with a recent leak that suggested Microsoft would be rolling out a "strategy to further monetize [the] Xbox subscriber base" in time for the holiday season.

The total two-year cost for the subsidized bundle as described comes in at $459, compared to the $418 Microsoft currently charges for a 4GB Xbox 360 and Kinect bundle ($299) and two years of Xbox Live Gold ($59/year). Whether that extra cost would be worthwhile depends largely on the precise features Microsoft offers for the new monthly subscribers, and how comfortable consumers are with being essentially locked to their game system for a two-year period (Microsoft would reportedly mimic cell phone providers in charging an early termination fee to those who decide to drop out before the term is up).

Economical or not, such a move would represent a major change in the way game consoles are presented to consumers. Rather than offering hardware as a loss-leader for the eventual sale of games and accessories, Microsoft would essentially be subsidizing Xbox 360 sales to attract the potentially much more lucrative flow of monthly video subscription revenue. Given the relative sizes of the current markets for console games versus video services, that might not be such a crazy idea.